Why Blu-Ray still hasn’t “taken off”.

In 1998/99, DVD technology was released to Europe (Japan and the US got it a bit earlier.)

The fact that, just two years later, Sony’s PS2 supported the format, using it for the discs for games as well as playing movies, and that Microsoft’s XBox also used and supported the format should say something for the kind of impact it had.

However, Blu-Ray hit Europe in mid 2006, and the PS3 was released at the end of 06 in the USA, and March ‘07 in Europe. We’re three years into Blu-ray’s life, yet most people still aren’t buying Blu-Ray movies. The equivalent time for DVD would be early 2003, most likely. By this time, the amount of DVD stocked by a retailer compared to the amount of VHS is probably comparable to the amount of Blu-Ray currently stocked, yet it’s still DVD’s that you rent, DVD’s that talk about.

Why? Let me explain the main reasons.

The first reason is that High Def just isn’t that much of an improvement? Don’t get me wrong, HD looks fantastic, and is a god-send for gaming graphics, but when some of the top selling DVDs for 2009 are things like Twlight (Oh no! the sparkles aren’t HD!) or various Disney cartoons (Up, Bolt, Madagascar 2) and things like High School Musical, then why do you need HD? Avatar? Transformers? Star Trek? Yes, perhaps, but at best it’s a 50/50 split. Why splurge out on a new TV, a new player and then spend money upgrading your old media so you don’t need to keep your old DVDs around, when DVD is “good enough”?

The second reason is one of convenience. When you wanted to watch a specific scene of a VHS, you needed to know roughly how far in it was, and spend time using Fast Forward/Rewind. Then, once you had watched the movie, you needed to put it back to the start (or do that when you next watched it.) With DVD, you put it in, and it gives the choice for where in the movie to start, broken down by scene.

The third reason is the obvious one, the scapegoat for all things in the last couple years: Recession.
Then again, it’s a valid reason. If your food and electricity bills are going up, and your TV works fine, why would you buy a new HD one, especially when you need to pay extra to get HD TV, therefore you are relying on what other media you have. If you don’t want to splash out on a new TV, then why would you buy a Blu-Ray player, and then spend around double for the same movie, on average that is. Play.co.uk are selling Star Trek on DVD for £9.99 at time of writing. Want to know how much the Blu-Ray is? Special 3-disc edition “With Digital Copy” (for you iPod/iPhone/Media Player PC, etc) is £17.99. That’s the cheapest Blu-Ray version. No budget option. The same applies to other things, like Family Guy (DVD: £9.99 Blu-Ray: £14.99, on hmv.co.uk, more expensive in store last time I looked) and most others. You pay a premium for the new format, and you have to buy all the new equipment to use it. In 2003, DVD didn’t have a recession to fight against, and it had the same TV we always had, and the players were as cheap as Blu-Ray is today. If you bought a new PC, you had a DVD drive in it most likely.

Blu-Ray isn’t doomed, it will certainly do well, but people have realised that DVD is “Good enough” and that you may very well just be asked for the money in 5 more years when Blu-Ray’s successor comes out.

Do you have a growing collection of Blu-Ray? I would have assumed a resounding “yes” knowing my usual readership, but then again, I still use my low-def TV with my low-def consoles and my low-def DVD’s. Hell, my phone has a resolution of 320×480 and I’m constantly amazed by how good it looks on the small screen. For those who don’t know, that’s sort of a mish-mash between better than TV signals and worse than TV signals at the same time. (Nobody said it made sense)

Popularity: 73% [?]

Happy New Year!

Welcome to the future.

Back to the Future II is set about 5 years from now.
Bladerunner is set just 9 years away now.
The Simpson’s episode “Lisa’s Wedding” is set in 2010.

2010 is the point in time where people growing up in the 60/70’s expected people to be living on the Moon.

On a personal note, not something I usually do on this blog, I am more than welcome to bid a farewell to 2009. It was a year full of ups and downs, and a lot of big changes in my life. (Leaving university without completing my degree, for example.)

I hope you all have done at least a few things you are proud of in 2009, and I wish you all the best life can bring in the coming year.

Popularity: 74% [?]

Day 5 of the Steam Sale (Cyber Monday)

As some of my readers will know, this is a busy week for everyone in the USA. Thursday was Thanksgiving, aka early practice for Christmas Dinner, and Friday was “Black Friday”, supposedly known as such for being the day in which companies are financially “in the black” for the year (aka profitable) and also known for a Stock Market Crash in the late ’20s.

In the last few years, in addition to Black Friday’s deals, the Monday has become known for online retailers offering deals to try to compensate for all the Brick & Mortar shops undercutting them on Friday, and whilst it was not a deliberate Cyber Monday deal, today’s final day of Steam sale (as mentioned in the previous post) so happened to be the best day for me.

Amongst other deals available, the ones appealing to me were a nice puzzle game called Quantz that I would highly recommend trying the demo for, though I personally am not going to buy it, as I doubt I would play it any more than the demo allows.

Next up, we have a Dungeon Keeper meets Austin Powers game, Evil Genius. Basically, you spend your time building your base and recruiting minions, in an environment much like you could expect from Dr. Evil or an especially bad Bond villain. Having read the reviews, and played the demo, for it, I’m going to leave it also, as you reportedly spend much of the early game waiting around for minions to steal money, so you can recruit more minions, until you have enough to do proper Evil genius activities, and you also need to protect your base from the Agent’s of “Good”. (Apparently your minions are too stupid to attack the agents without being deliberately told to.) For £1.74, I would say pick it up if you don’t have Dungeon Keeper 1 or 2, but I have the first one already.

(paying the bills: )

Next, we have the games I did pick up, starting with DICE’s free-running game, Mirror’s Edge. Having played it a little on the 360, I decided that the game was worth £3.24, even if I do have to wait until I build myself a new PC before I can play it.

Finally, we have the Special Edition version of the supreme “The Secret Of Monkey Island”. If you have never played the game, stop reading right now, and go buy it for the ridiculously low price of £1.74

Bought it? Good. For those who have played it before, and wondering why they should buy this special edition, it has been fully revamped into HD, with a modern art style, full voice acting (performed by the original cast of the Monkey island franchise no less) and the scene-by-scene switching option of choosing between the new, HD, voice-acted version, and the original version, letting you reminisce of the wonders of the 1990 original.

I really truly mean it when I say everyone should play Secret of Monkey Island, and £1.74 is too low to say no to. Disagree? Take it to the comments!

Popularity: 81% [?]

Game Review: Lucidity

Since Wednesday, Steam, VALVe’s Content Delivery System and widely thought to have around 70% of the online distribution market for games, has been having an early sale. It was intended to be a 5-day sale, but due to VALVe, along with the rest of the USA, being closed for thanksgiving, the initial days deals were made to last 48hours, rather 24hours like the other days of the sale have been.

Since it was so cheap, I bought the Lucas Arts game, “Lucidity”, which was developed by those behind the re-imagining of “Tales of Monkey Island”.

First of all, above all else, £1.74 (the sale price, valid until 4:00pm, 30th November 2009) is easily low enough to justify buying the game. It is very lovely, and now that I’ve had a good go, while I wouldn’t have paid the original £6.99 asking price, £4.99 would have had me.

The game has a basic premise, there is a little girl “Sofi”, whose dreams are the levels. There are enemies to avoid, and fireflies to collect, nothing unusual in this, as Mario is simply the same, but with coins and goomba’s. What makes this game intriguing is surreal images of the dreamscapes, and the beautiful art style used to portray the game, and the unusual game play.

Instead of controlling, say, Mario, powering through Mushroom Kingdom, Sofi automatically moves constantly to the right, the screen scrolling with her. Instead of having control of her, you instead are given objects (stairs, planks of wood, springy-shoes, slingshot) and each object comes along, allowing you to store one for later use, but you largely depend on what the game gives you (though there are no punishments for using objects outside of anywhere Sofi will be.)

Here is a trailer video, including game play (skip to 1:15 for the game play)
Lucidity Trailer

Overall, the game play, while intriguing, is not all that usable. The game would have been much better had, for example, been mapped to a specific key, of if you could use the mouse wheel to scroll through them.

I’ll probably rarely play the game again after today, but it was easily worth the money, and the download, as it is a unique idea, set in a beautiful environment.

Anyone else pick it, or any other games, up in the Steam sale?

Popularity: 78% [?]

Mall Of Duty: Codern Warfare

See what I did there?

So Modern Warfare 2 was released on Tuesday. Impressions from those playing it seems good to me, but I’m just saddened by the launch. It seems to have came and gone without all the fuss It seemed to be generating beforehand.

In fact, the only thing people are asking now is if we can price-match Sainsbury’s, but they only got around 20 copies per store per format, we got a LOT more, so it’s nonsense to expect us to match them.

The only other issue seems to be the controversial nature of the game. It is such that some parts of the game may be so bad, the option to skip them has been added. (These sections include the now infamous “terrorist level” where you open fire on civilians in an airport.)

This I will say though: even if my PC would run the game, I wouldn’t buy it on PC. Infinity Ward and Activision have, in a move almost as bad as removing LAN-only gaming in StarCraft II, removed the dedicated server functionality, AND limited games to 9v9 as is the case on the consoles. MW2 is not a game for a clan to play, as they are unable to run their own clan server, severely depleting the use of the game in PC gaming groups.

What do you think of Modern Warfare 2?

Popularity: 72% [?]

I’ll Be Back

(Don’t ask how many “I’m back” post titles I had in my head, there were a lot of them.)

After a few months since the last post, and the site going AWOL on me (don’t ask, let me just say thank you to Dave Walker, Daviey on Freenode, for the great VPS service powering the site for a great price) I have now returned.

Most everything is as it was, with a few things missing that anyone other than me won’t notice, and I hope to have regular posts resume some time soon (yes, I know I’ve said that a few times now.)

Having been hard at work, I can safely say that I am incredibly glad to have a free fortnight for R&R.

If anyone wants to know, the VPS is running Ubuntu 9.04 server and I am working on it entirely myself, to avoid anything going wrong like what I have just recovered from.

I’ll think up some posts to make some time soon, but I thought I should announce the return of the site, even if just for archival purposes.

Popularity: 100% [?]

Windows vs. Ubuntu — An Experiment.

I found an interesting study on the Ubuntu forums today, which I would like to share with you all.

The user Shibblet is writing a paper about habits in humans, and decided that habits often showed best when trying to take someone away from what is familiar to them.

Here is the post:

Follow up from a discussion here.

Jeannie C.

Jeannie is Quite happy with Ubuntu. All of her web activities could be accomplished with Firefox just as easily as Internet Explorer 7.

She was quite taken with Open Office, and liked that it came pre-installed. She had been wanting to get Excel, but didn’t want to pay the $150.00 for MS Office.

Her main drawback was that videos that she received in her email didn’t play. I told her about downloading the “Gstreamer” codec packs from Add/Remove, and that solved her problem.

Next thing you know, she’s downloading all sorts of stuff from Add/Remove. Checking it out, uninstalling it if necessary. She told me “You know that star rating doesn’t mean anything. I have a few programs that I love, and they only have one star.”

After a week of use, Jeanne has only booted into Windows once, and that was to grab her MP3’s and Photos to a jump drive…

My conclusion: Jeannie is open to new ideas, and willing to try them out. She didn’t know there was an alternative, but now is much happier with her computer than before. She still dual boots her computer, with Wubi, just to keep her options open.

Sandra S.

Well now. From an original statement that “I always use Linux. I just can’t because DeVry says to use XP.” to “I don’t remember Linux being like this.” We’ve quickly established that Sandra is full of crap. So I do my best to set the crap aside, and continue with her observations.

I wish I would have recorded this for you all to listen to… this phone call was HILARIOUS.

Sandy: Firefox won’t connect.
Me: You’re connected. Just put in the web-address.
Sandy: What do you mean web-address.
Me: You know, like [url]www.google.com[/url]
Sandy: Oh, you mean the web-site-address.
Me: Okay, sure.
Sandy: Well, it’s really slow. I’m going to check my email.

A few minutes later…

Sandy: Look! You said ‘NO’ viruses. It just got a virus from that picture!
Me: Um, huh, what?
Sandy: That e-mail from my sister has a virus on the picture of my nephew.
Me: I don’t think…
Sandy: See, you move the mouse over it and it get’s bigger. Move the mouse away, and it gets smaller.
Me: Sandy, that’s not a…
Sandy: That’s the whole reason I won’t use Linux! There’s too many problems, and no one knows how to fix it. Now I have to run a McAfee scan again!
Me: Wow, you’re about as much fun as having sex with a light-socket!

My Conclusion: At Sandra’s age (53), she’s grown accustomed to doing things her way. You can’t teach an old dog new tricks. But dear god, what turned her into a pit-bull. Sandra was complaining about this experiment from the beginning, giving me lecture after lecture, and only agreed to do this to help with my class. The funny part is she didn’t realize how much she really helped. This is a paper about habits, and HOLY CRAP, she “enforces” her habits.

Alyssa I.

It didn’t seem to matter one way or the other. XP or Ubuntu. I think Alyssa only uses the computer when she ‘HAS’ to. “I mean, Ubuntu works just fine, but so does XP.”

I took a few moments to explain security, viruses, and cost.

“Well, no viruses is nice. But if I can’t connect to the internet, and I call the help desk, how are they going to help me?” and “My computer came with Windows, why not just use Windows? I mean, I didn’t have to buy it, so who cares?”

Quite a statement in itself. It has merit. The illusion of security. Funny though, as all of us Linux users know that the help-desk doesn’t do jack-squat anyway.

My Conclusion: Alyssa doesn’t really ‘use’ computers, therefore no habits have really formed. It was a bit like selling a freezer to an Eskimo.

Jack K.

Ahh, Jack… you little power user, you! Finally someone to pick apart Ubuntu and truly deal with all of the actual differences.

An odd turn of play, Jack decided that he wasn’t going to use Wubi. He would do a dual-boot all by himself. This made his initial week truly “Hell”. He couldn’t get his ATI drivers to work, it caused multiple problems with video playback, and compiz. So Jack went to the boards to find a solution. Try this, try that, try these… Dear God, I would have given up twice as quickly, but he stuck it out.

He was outside his comfort zone, and it was apparent when he wasn’t able to solve his problem quickly. He kept trying things the way he was used to. He spent most of his time searching for DEBS of known Windows programs on Google. A lot of his statements were “If it can’t run ‘enter Windows program here’, then what good is it?” I started explaining alternatives. I told him of programs like aMSN instead of MSN Messenger, Amarok instead of Winamp. But he was stuck on running Windows programs. I told him to download Wine, and see if it could run his programs. He didn’t want to toy with it anymore.

Now comes the “Hell” part. After He decided to remove it… Grub stayed. He then tried to remove Grub. In the process, his recovery partition was lost. He ended up Using the LiveCD, to boot, then grab his data off onto Jump Drives, so he could reinstall Windows… Linux to the rescue! Whether he liked Ubuntu or not, he was certainly glad that it was there for him when he ‘needed’ it.

My Conclusion: Jack has used Windows for most of his computing life. He has learned how to use it, and utilize it very well. I am inclined to think that it is even beyond just habit for Jack, almost to the point of instinct. His habits make it difficult to find alternative ways to accomplish tasks. If Jack were asked to think outside the box, he would have to remove the box from inside his head first.

Joey A.

Well, the first person to actually use Ubuntu in a professional business environment. After a lot of convincing, he decided that he would use it for one full day at the office. Due to the nature of the use of this computer, Joey will be running off of an external HD.

He immediately noticed the performance difference. And thought Compiz was kind of cool. After explaining how to add a repository, he thought that was amazing. “Your drivers will automatically update? No way!” With the ability to read PDF’s by default, queueing up print jobs would be a snap.

Then came the real challenge. Setting up the printer… Which, mind you, is not an ordinary desktop printer. It’s a RIP unit from EFI, which provides print services to a high speed color copier. This “Fiery RIP” unit is a postscript interpreter, so we thought about running a generic postscript driver… no dice. Apparently this proprietary driver is only available for PC or Mac.

This took up a major portion of the day. Guess this, guess that, try this, f*ck that… etc. etc. etc.

Finally, he came to the conclusion that because Ubuntu doesn’t run Adobe CS4, nor can set up his printers, it wasn’t the operating system he could use. However, he would use it on a non-commercial based home computer in a heartbeat. It was great for web-browsing, basic office applications like OpenOffice, and multimedia.

My conclusion: Joey immediately noticed the performance and security benefits of Ubuntu, but cannot adapt it to his business.

Peggy A.

Mom. Mom decided to try it, because she has issues with her laptop and Vista. I get phone calls to the effect of “What is taking this thing so long? Why does it do that? I think I have a virus.”

To clue you in a bit, my mom called me one day and said… “A window popped up while I was web-browsing and it said that I needed this program to eliminate viruses. So I clicked on it, went to their web-site, paid for it, and downloaded it. But it doesn’t seem to be doing anything.” Well, we just worked our way back from there.

So I threw on Ubuntu with a Wubi installation (at her request to not mess anything up on the computer.) Her immediate response was that she loved the simplicity, and especially the Evolution Mail client. My Dad, who calls email “The Internet”, preferred Evolution as well.

Then we hit a speed bump. Ubuntu locked up, froze solid. Couldn’t do anything. So I had to hard boot the computer. Once again, about 10 minutes into it, it locked up solid. This is a piss off, to say the least. Hard boot a third time, lock up.

I don’t know what caused this problem, so I couldn’t fix it. Either case, if she had installed this herself, and had this problem… it’d be gone faster than you could blink.

So, conclusion here is: She liked it, but didn’t get the opportunity to use it.

Rose R.

Rose was thoroughly impressed, and seemed to have the time of her life. She liked the performance, the simplicity of customizing the interface, the menu, and especially Compiz. When I first checked on her, she had changed her theme, font, and screensaver.

To her, it booted fast, she could web-browse, run her instant messenger (Emesene, she found it in Add/Remove). Play games, for some reason, she loves Klotzki. She even thought clicking on “Install” inside Update Manager was WAY easier than Windows Update.

Her only issue was finding an alternative for “Kodak Photo Manager”. Familiarity was the only issue.

So Rose came into this unknowing, and what I found with her was… Ever single one of the tasks she used her Windows computer for, she could easily accomplish in Ubuntu.
My Conclusion: We did a Wubi installation to begin with, but after her first week of use, she called and asked me to help her get RID of Vista entirely.

Because of her lack of knowledge about computers, but her want to use them, led her to be open to an alternative. After using the alternative, she was absolutely blown away by the simplicity of the GNOME interface. She likes it, and isn’t looking back.

Nick A.

This guy is a graphic designer for a local print company. As a matter of fact, he’s a bit of competition for Joey A. This computer is used primarily for design work with Adobe CS4, and for printing on a large format vinyl sign printer. And because of the nature of this computer, we are running off of a LiveCD.
Well, once again, same problems in the professional environment. No printer support, and the proprietary program to run the Vinyl Printer is only for Windows.

But the great nature of Ubuntu, was that Nick decided to take the LiveCD home and run it there! He loved the interface, and the fact that it installed in about 10-15 minutes, 20 if he did all the updates. He actually explained to me that installing XP on the computer he has took at least 45 minutes, and an additional 2-3 hours of updating.

My conclusion: Ubuntu wouldn’t work for him due to proprietary software, but he liked enough to take it home and run it there!

Nick K.

A Linux hater, right from the get go. He only agreed to do this to help with my assignment. So, due to the nature of his crappy attitude, he will be running a LiveCD.

He toyed around with Firefox, went to his favorite web-sites. Checked his email, and basically told me “It’s the same thing as Windows, just brown. Why wouldn’t I just use Windows?” He didn’t notice any performance differences at all, he thought Compiz was just “fluff” , and because his computer CAME with Windows XP, why bother with anything else.

My Conclusion: He didn’t want to do it, he didn’t care to do it, he didn’t like doing it, he went back to his original setup. It’s about the same thing as trying to convince a two year old to try broccoli. No matter what you do, they ARE GOING TO HATE IT. It’s a preconceived notion that “different” means “bad”. If he were older, he’d be complaining about how much better the rotary dial phone system was, and how pissed off he is that we all switched to touch tone.

Brett J.

Viruses, Spyware, Adware, Pop-Up Blockers, Trojans, Worms, and of course “Porn”.

These are the contents of Brett’s computer. He downloads “Fix A”, and that didn’t work, so he downloads “Fix B.” and that didn’t work, etc. etc. etc.

Finally we are up to Fix “Double D” (Aptly named, because of where he got the virus to begin with.) I told him to wipe that computer clean, and start fresh. My original option was for Brett to do a Wubi installation, but because his computer is a bit of a Typhoid Mary, we clean wiped the sucker and put Ubuntu on it.

A week later, Brett is still up to his old antics on-line, and this time didn’t have to install anything. He didn’t get a single virus, worm, trojan, etc. on his computer.
Well, we found an online-condom for him, apparently. Then came a problem. Familiarity. He wanted to use his iPod, and couldn’t install iTunes. I told him about Hipo, and GTKPod. He tried both, but was insistant on iTunes. Finally we had a little talk.
“Look Brett, you have a computer that does everything you want it to, and doesn’t cause you any frustration what-so-ever. Now the only problem you have is iTunes. If you learn an alternative, which won’t take much time, you will not have these problems anymore.”

Apparently he took the advice, and is happily running Ubuntu.
My Conclusion: Familiarity breeds contempt. He only needed one program from Windows (or Mac). After viewing an alternative, and deciding to take the time to learn it, he was fine.

My grand conclusions: Familiarity, and compatibility.

Nick K. and Sandra S. were great to see how the human stubbornness has actually gone to the point of controlling their way of thinking, and refusal to allow new ideas or options into your life. Where Nick K. didn’t care, Sandra S. even went so far as to lie and make up stories to justify her unwillingness.

Jeanne C., Rose R., Joey A., and Nick A. were open people, open to new ideas. When they were told about an alternative to Windows, they were more than willing to give it a try. Their openness showed immediately that they knew it would be different than what they were used to. But I think difference was a major factor. Nick A, unfortunately cannot use it at his place of business, but loves it at home.

Alyssa I. Was kind of different. It really didn’t make much difference to her either way. But if it were an alternative way to accomplish something she was actually interested in, it might be different. Alyssa is about as interested in computers, as a the prom queen wanting to fix cars.

Jack K. and Peggy A. Both had problems with their installation. Whereas Peggy’s problem wasn’t really attempted to be fixed, it was however, easily removed. Jack was a completely different story. I can’t blame anyone for wanting to be rid of a hardship, which is why a lot of us don’t use Windows to begin with. The funny part is, it doesn’t matter how much it costs, if it doesn’t work, no one is going to use it.

Brett J. This was almost done just for the pure comedy of it all. But I wanted to find someone who has problem after problem with Windows, and see if could be eliminated. And to much surprise, it was. Completely eliminated. He did still suffer from the familiarity complex, and wanted things to be the same, just different.

(paying the bills)

I thought this was a really well written up, and performed, study, both on the subject matter: habits, and of Ubuntu and Linux in general compared to Windows. For most people, it’s only what little that remains unsupported in Linux that stops them from doing it. Heck, get Adobe CS onto Linux native and you would get a bunch more people using it straight away.

Any comments? You can put them below, or on the original post

Popularity: 15% [?]

Second time around.

Recently in the tech news there have been many things focussed on doing things right the second time around, fixing things the first couldn’t quite do.

First off, we have one that I’m stretching to fit into that criteria: IBM’s new project, Watson.

IBM have been one of many groups who have been seeking to advance computing into the human realms. First they tried to beat a grandmaster at Chess, and now they are seeking to beat Trebek and win Jeopardy!

What they plan to do, is to break down the Jeopardy questions into a set of structural components, and therefore identify the various facts, and from the facts, work out what the parent of them all is. There is an example on Technology Review:

[The leading scientist, David Ferrucci] describes how the technology would handle the following Jeopardy!-style question: “It’s the opera mentioned in the lyrics of a 1970 number-one hit by Smokey Robinson and the Miracles.”

The Watson engine uses natural-language processing techniques to break the question into structural components. In this case, the pieces include 1) an opera; 2) the opera is mentioned in a song; 3) the song was a hit in 1970; and 4) the hit was by Smokey Robinson and the Miracles.

In searching its databases for information that could be relevant to these segments, the system might find hundreds of passages. These could include the following three:

“Pagliacci,” the opera about a clown who tries to keep his feelings “hid”;

Smokey Robinson’s Motown hit record of the ’60s “Tears of a Clown”;

“Tears of a Clown” by the Miracles hit #1 in the UK in 1970.

By analyzing these passages, Watson can identify “Pagliacci” as being “an opera,” although this on its own would not be much help, since many other passages also identify opera names. The second result identifies a hit record, “The Tears of a Clown,” by “Smokey Robinson,” which the system judges to be probably the same thing as “Smokey Robinson and the Miracles.” However, many other song titles would be generated in a similar manner. The probability that the result is accurate would also be judged low, because the song is associated with “the ’60s” and not “1970.” The third passage, however, reinforces the idea that “The Tears of a Clown” was a hit in 1970, provided the system determines that “The Miracles” refers to the same thing as “Smokey Robinson and the Miracles.”

From the first of these three passages, the Watson engine would know that Pagliacci is an opera about a clown who hides his feelings. To make the connection to Smokey Robinson, the system has to recognize that “tears” are strongly related to “feelings,” and since it knows that Pagliacci is about a clown that tries to keep its feelings hid, it guesses – correctly – that Pagliacci is the answer. Of course, the system might still make the wrong choice “depending on how the wrong answers may be supported by the available evidence,” says Ferrucci.

It’s easy, Ferrucci says, for less sophisticated natural-language systems to conclude that “The Tears of a Clown” is the answer by missing the fact that the request was for an opera referenced by that song. Such a conclusion could be triggered by passages that have lots of keywords that match the question.

This I incredibly interesting if it works, as it means that we are getting closer to having computers actually understand how our languages work internally, rather than just having a façade of understanding.

Next up in the “Play it again Sam!” files (yes, I know that’s not the actual quote from the movie, but it’s the popular version) we have a new form of Steganography. Steganography is the art of writing and sending messages so that only the sender and receiver know the messages are even there.

[The] system, dubbed retransmission steganography (RSTEG), relies on sender and receiver using software that deliberately asks for retransmission even when email data packets are received successfully. “The receiver intentionally signals that a loss has occurred. The sender then retransmits the packet but with some secret data inserted in it” [one of the inventors says]

Basically, you can send false data in one packet, then tell the sender it was “corrupt”, and they will send the correct packet. Real world example time:

You are browsing my site from a country where facebook is blocked, so you cannot use Facebook Connect. My server could be set-up to send the facebook packets to you, then have you request regular packets for the webpage. Anyone viewing the traffic would see normal traffic by and large, as in 1 in 1000 packets need to be re-sent anyway, and a little overhead isn’t enough to get noticed. This system looks good for avoiding any censorship on the web.

Talking of censorship on the web, we have some great news: Australia’s Internet Barrier Reef (see: Great Firewall of China) is looking, now, to be an opt-in system at the ISP level. While it would still mean many ISPs wold probably join with the Aussie government, it means there would at least be options for those who want to have the internet left to their own discretion.

One more story after the ads:

In fantastic news, and a great turn-around, much like the Australian censorship turnaround (turnarounds being a “second-thought” ;) ), the UK’s music collection society, PRS, has announced a new pricing plan it hopes may entice YouTube and Pandora back to the UK market. Pandora pulled out at the start of 2008, and YouTube began removing content from the view of UK users last March. From the BBC:

From 1 July 2009, firms will have to pay 0.085p for each track streamed, down from the previous rate of 0.22p. [The] head of the music streaming service We7 told BBC News he welcomed the new charges. ‘It’s brilliant. Not so much the rates but the realization by the PRS that things have to change in the digital world. Till now it’s felt like they were not listening,’ he said. … ‘They [the PRS] are getting in touch with the reality of the digital world.’ [The PRS's managing director said] ‘We’ve laid our stall out and listened to everyone who would engage with us. We’ve consulted with the 25 firms that represent 97% of our revenue over the past six months and have been given opinions from many others. We need to ensure the music artists are paid for their work, but we also wanted to make sure that the framework was in place to enable the digital market to grow

Finally more services along the lines of Spotify and iPlayer will be operating inside the UK. I will welcome Pandora back, and welcome Hulu’s first foray into the UK when the time comes.

Comments? Remember you can use the Facebook Connect feature to let people know you read this by posting an FB update when you post a comment, (I *think* the FB Connect feature is working now….)

EDIT: Links:

Technology Review about IBM’s “Watson”
New Scientist on the new Steganography idea
The BBC on the reduced multimedia streaming rates

Popularity: 12% [?]

AFK

Sorry I haven’t been around much of late, I’ve been hard at work, so I’ve been AFK and offline a lot of the time.

Hoping to get back to regular service some time soon.

Popularity: 12% [?]

When will people realise?

Twice in the last few months has a group of people tried to limit my choice as to things I can do due to a fight amongst religions in the middle east.

First there was the “Stop The War” group (who really meant stop the war in my side’s favour) trying to stop a bunch of companies being allowed to fund students at my Uni. Many of my friends would have lost their funding, and companies like Microsoft would have been forced to pull out, amongst others. The entire thing was a mess, which has thankfully been reverted with a referendum vote.

Today, I found out that Clem, who is the lead developed for “Linux Mint”, has also tried to hinder my right to choice.. Linux is “Free as in speech” software in that anyone can see the original code, and change it for their needs. Clem has now asked anyone who disagrees on his views on Israel/Palestine to not use Linux Mint, and to not offer any changes to the code. Given that the code is licensed under something called the GPL, which forbids any restrictions on usage or who can change it, he has broken the license.
Here is what I said on his blog:

Clem,

You said it yourself:

“This is not the place to talk about this” and, IMO, this should have been on a personal blog, not the Linux Mint blog.

I have always avoided choosing a side in this fight, but if you say that those who disagree with this blog post (and there are countless reasons for that to be true) then you are saying that the only ones who ARE welcome are those who explicitly agree with you.

I have looked at this conflict multiple times, and frankly each side is as bad as the other, so I have said many times I will not choose a side, especially as I am an Atheist, and this is a fight of religions.

Since I don’t explicitly agree with you, then I guess I must not agree with you, and therefore am unwelcome to use your distribution. I don’t use it anyway, but now that you have made GPL code associated with a political stance, which I do not have, then I will not even suggest to others to use it.

I will continue to use Crunchbang, and suggest others use Kubuntu/Mandriva if they are newer to Linux.

I hope you thought about the consequences of making this comment on the official Mint blog before you did it, because this may surprise you.

– Mehall

It just aggravates that people think they have right of denying choice of other people who might not necessarily agree with the. Gahhhh, drives me mad.

Popularity: 15% [?]

Facebook

Already a member?
Login
Login using Facebook:
Last visitors
Visit Mehall.co.cc, my site!

Calendar Archive

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728